Roughly nine in ten startups fail, based on 2025 data compiled from founder post mortems by Exploding Topics. Funding gaps and weak product fit dominate many stories, but people and culture problems also appear repeatedly in these accounts.

Analyses of post mortems by CB Insights highlight team composition and internal conflict as recurring failure drivers. A separate analysis notes that team issues—including skill gaps, misaligned founder expectations, and poor hiring decisions—account for approximately 23 percent of startup failures, according to CB Insights' review of founder accounts.

These findings point toward a simple pattern. Startups that adopt clear, impersonal standards for hiring, conduct, documentation, and decision making from the beginning reduce legal and cultural risk. They also create the conditions for stronger performance, since consistent culture and organizational practices are foundational to execution.

Early Professionalization Pays Off

  • Employment law risk for startups rises sharply without documented HR controls.
  • Team composition and internal conflict appear repeatedly in startup failure accounts.
  • Team issues drive approximately 23 percent of startup failures according to CB Insights.
  • High profile cases at Uber and WeWork show how weak HR and culture controls can derail growth.
  • Informal practices that feel manageable at 15 people can escalate into systemic problems at scale.

People Risk Behind Startup Failure


Post mortem reviews show that people risk is not a niche concern. In CB Insights' ranking of failure reasons, founders frequently cite the wrong team, internal conflict, and leadership gaps as contributors to collapse. These issues interact with every other problem, from fundraising to product delivery.

A summary of CB Insights data reports that 23 percent of failed startups pointed to not having the right team as a reason. That category includes skill gaps, misaligned expectations among founders, and hiring decisions that do not match the roles required at different growth stages.

These findings sit alongside the headline result that roughly 90 percent of startups fail. Even if precise percentages differ across analyses, they converge on a core point: people issues are large enough to warrant the same early attention founders give to runway and product.

Professionalization of culture tries to address this specific risk. Instead of relying on personal trust or founder charisma, it replaces ad hoc decisions with written expectations, consistent processes, and clear lines of authority. That shift can feel formal for a small team but becomes a buffer as the company grows.

More Business Articles

Don't Build in a Vacuum: The Imperative of Lean MVP Market Testing
artistic representation of minimum viable product development and testing
The Pareto Few: How Top Talent Shapes Company Output
Vector image of a pie chart
Early Startup Employees Shoulder Outsized Risk for Fraction-Sized Equity
A small startup office in Palo Alto
U.S. Stocks' Money Ratio Reaches Dot-Com Peaks Amid Volatility and Slow Liquidity
New York Stock Exchange facade with American flag

What Early Professionalization Looks Like


Professionalization in a startup context means establishing corporate style structures on a smaller scale. Typical elements include a basic employee handbook, a code of conduct, defined job descriptions, written offer letters, and documented reporting lines. Together, these tools turn implicit norms into explicit standards.

Legal compliance sits at the center of this work. Wyrick Robbins' guide to employment law for startups describes seven recurring mistakes, including hasty hires, poor background check practices under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and weak documentation that complicates later disputes. It also highlights pay practice issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Pitfalls range from misclassifying workers as contractors to using informal agreements in place of written contracts. Each shortcut might save time early, but it increases exposure to wage claims, contract disputes, and regulatory penalties as headcount and revenue grow.

Operational HR guidance emphasizes that even small teams benefit from up front clarity. One analysis notes that handling HR correctly helps protect the company and build trust with the team, and that this foundation supports sustainable growth rather than constraining it.

For early stage startups, professionalization does not require a large HR department. A small set of standardized documents, simple recordkeeping practices, and a clear performance review cadence can be enough to convert personal values into repeatable routines. The key is to treat these routines as non negotiable, just like code review or security checks.

Cultural, Operational, and Legal Risks of Staying Informal


Surveys suggest that the romantic image of startup culture does not match many workers' experiences. Respondents linked toxicity to blurred boundaries, inconsistent expectations, and behavior they considered unprofessional. In environments without clear conduct standards, employees may see frequent oversharing, favoritism, or social pressure to join activities that do not feel optional. These dynamics can damage trust even when founders believe they are building a close knit team.

Operational weaknesses often follow the same pattern. Candidates with strong charisma can impress managers in unstructured interviews, only to underperform once on the job. When roles and evaluation criteria are vague, early hires may be selected based on personal rapport rather than documented skills.

Without formal job descriptions, consistent onboarding, and defined decision rights, teams can struggle to coordinate as headcount grows. Work may be duplicated or neglected, and key decisions may depend on who has informal influence rather than who holds the relevant responsibility. This makes performance management reactive and highly personal.

Strategically, informal cultures often scale poorly. New employees who did not join in the earliest days may not share personal histories with founders or early staff. If expectations and processes only live in unwritten norms, later hires find it harder to navigate the organization, which can slow execution and raise turnover.

The legal consequences can be significant. Employment law issues in informal startups include scenarios such as terminating staff without documentation, mishandling overtime for workers classified as exempt, and failing to formalize equity promises. Each misstep increases the likelihood of disputes that consume leadership time and financial resources.

Even when lawsuits do not materialize, informal practices can trigger administrative complaints or demands for back pay. Investigating and resolving these issues requires management focus that could otherwise support product or customer work. Over time, the cumulative distraction can threaten a startup's ability to meet deadlines or raise capital.

When Culture Breaks at Scale: Uber and WeWork


High profile cases illustrate how weak HR controls and informal norms can undermine even fast growing companies. In 2017, engineer Susan Fowler published a detailed account of her time at Uber, describing repeated reports of harassment and HR responses that treated high performing managers as too valuable to discipline.

Coverage in the New York Times summarized her claims, noting that internal competition among managers was intense and that HR dismissed some complaints. Fowler's account described a pattern where managers appeared to undermine peers in pursuit of promotion opportunities.

Investigations and leadership changes followed, but the case shows how hard it is to correct culture once problematic behavior is entrenched. For a period, performance and growth metrics appeared to take precedence over consistent enforcement of conduct standards, which later created reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny.

WeWork's trajectory presents a related pattern. Reporting describes accounts of long working hours, heavy socializing tied to work, and ethical lapses that accompanied an aggressive expansion strategy. These conditions coexisted with rapid growth in valuation until investor confidence deteriorated.

In both cases, cultural issues were not isolated from strategy. Norms around overwork, blurred personal boundaries, and tolerance of rule bending affected decision quality, governance, and external relationships. The eventual corrections required new leadership, governance changes, and in WeWork's case a major restructuring of the business.

For smaller startups, these stories provide a cautionary reference point rather than a direct template. They show how informal practices that seem manageable in a 15 person team can escalate into systemic problems when applied across thousands of employees and multiple markets without corresponding controls.

Implementing Professional Culture from Day One


Practical professionalization starts with a simple, accurate employee handbook. Guides recommend documenting core policies on equal employment opportunity, anti harassment rules, working hours, timekeeping, leave, and use of company equipment, even when the founding team is small.

The handbook should also explain benefits eligibility, remote work expectations, and how performance feedback will be delivered. Employees who understand how compensation, time off, and evaluations work are less likely to rely on assumptions or informal assurances, which reduces friction and perceived inequities.

Hiring processes are another early leverage point. Structured hiring frameworks can include clear job descriptions, standardized interview questions tied to role requirements, documented evaluation notes, and compliant background checks under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. This structure not only reduces bias but also creates records that support future promotion, termination, or reorganization decisions.

Performance management benefits from similar discipline. Even a lightweight cycle of quarterly check ins, written goals, and concise notes on outcomes helps managers separate feedback from personality. When concerns arise, having a documented history enables more consistent and defensible decisions about coaching, reassignment, or separation.

Clear escalation paths are essential for trust. Employees should know how to raise concerns about misconduct, pay issues, or interpersonal conflict, and what steps HR or leadership will take in response. The Uber case shows the damage that occurs when complaints are acknowledged but not addressed through credible processes.

Governance structures also play a role. As startups add independent directors or advisors, they can assign explicit oversight responsibility for people and culture risks. Regular board level reviews of key HR metrics and serious incidents create accountability that does not depend solely on the founding team.

For distributed teams, written standards become even more important. Time zones and remote communication reduce opportunities to clarify expectations informally. Comprehensive documentation of policies, decision making norms, and communication channels helps maintain consistency across locations and reduces the chance that local practices drift away from company standards.

Professionalization as Strategic Infrastructure


Early professionalization looks less like bureaucracy and more like core infrastructure. It serves as a protective layer that also builds employee trust, while consistent organizational practices support execution at every stage of growth.

Founders sometimes assume that corporate style policies slow innovation or reduce flexibility. The evidence from startup post mortems and large company case studies suggests a different pattern. Minimal structures around hiring, conduct, documentation, and escalation often prevent small issues from compounding into strategic, legal, or reputational crises.

With approximately 90 percent of startups failing and a notable share of those failures involving people and team issues, the cost of postponing professional standards is clear. Treating HR compliance and culture as early design choices, rather than late stage repairs, improves the odds that a promising product has a stable organization behind it.

Sources