When a buyer purchases a home in a U.S. community governed by a homeowners association, the transaction usually includes more than the house and lot. The purchase also brings a set of covenants that have been recorded with the county, which operate as binding rules for that property.

A 2025 explainer from FirstService Residential notes that covenants “run with the land,” meaning they apply to every current and future owner of the home. Those documents typically include the obligation to pay association assessments and to follow association rules that were drafted before the latest buyer entered the community.

Management companies and software vendors operate within that structure. Firms such as Goodwin & Company direct owners to digital portals for paying assessments and monitoring accounts. Owners who ignore those portals risk missing account details, notices and documents even when paper alternatives exist.

The resulting risk for homeowners is not simply “an app to pay dues.” It is that a deed-linked obligation can be practically administered through a portal whose standardized click-to-accept terms shape what happens if there is a dispute. These terms, accepted at registration rather than negotiated, can change what damages are realistically recoverable and how resident-provided information may be used, shared, or treated if something goes wrong.

Key Findings

  • HOA covenants recorded with counties bind current and future owners to assessments and rules that attach to the property.
  • Boards and management firms select third party portals that become the default channel for payments, account visibility, and in some communities, notices and documents.
  • Major portal terms commonly require individual arbitration, waive class or representative proceedings, and limit damages—sometimes to a single transaction amount and, in some terms, as low as $500.
  • Vendor terms can also grant broad rights to use resident-provided information for operations, analytics, and improvements, while disclaiming error-free or “secure” operation and narrowing remedies for data incidents.
  • Homeowners generally cannot negotiate these terms individually; the practical opt-out is slower access or reduced visibility, not different legal terms.

Covenants That Bind Future Owners


HOA covenants are recorded with local land records so that they are legally attached to each lot in the community. When ownership changes, the new owner is automatically bound by the same restrictions and obligations established by prior owners and developers.

The recorded documents usually describe assessment duties, architectural standards and use restrictions along with the association’s authority to enforce those requirements. FirstService Residential explains that when buyers purchase a home governed by such documents, they agree to follow the rules and regulations contained in the covenant even if they did not take part in drafting them.

Covenants often authorize the board of directors to hire professional management firms to handle billing, maintenance coordination and communication. As a result, buyers do not negotiate directly with those firms during the home purchase but instead inherit the existing management relationship selected by the association or by a developer.

Because covenants typically do not expire with a single transfer, they can keep the same basic assessment structure in place for many years. Replacing a management firm or altering the systems used for assessment collection usually requires coordinated action by the board or, in some communities, an owner vote under the procedures in the governing documents.

This structure gives covenants a practical impact that extends beyond basic community rules. In many associations, the combination of recorded covenants and board contracts determines which payment portals, communication channels and dispute systems will be used for as long as the underlying agreements remain in force.

More Public Affairs Articles

Foreign Funding Gap Leaves U.S. Think Tanks Exposed to Chinese Influence
American and Chinese flags
After The World Factbook: Replacing a One-Stop Country Reference
Logo of the CIA World Factbook c. 2001
CPB Dissolves After Congress Ends Federal Support
Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo, circa 1992
Six Logistics Truths Reshape Joint Force Readiness
artistic representation of strategic global logistics

The Portal as Default Channel


On its online payment instructions page, Goodwin & Company presents the TownSq platform as the primary way for owners to pay assessments and manage their accounts. The company states that owners can make a one-time payment or set up auto-pay through TownSq on the web or via the TownSq App after registering.

Below the highlighted TownSq option, Goodwin lists additional methods, including one-time eCheck payments through the Alliance Association Bank portal and a separate card payment option via AAFS Payments. Those alternatives remain available, but the placement and detail signal that the portal path is treated as the standard channel for recurring payments and balance checks.

When notices, violation letters and meeting materials are posted primarily inside such portals, the practical effect is to encourage regular portal use even if paper mail remains technically available. Owners who rely only on checks and physical letters may receive information later than those using the app or may overlook documents that are mainly distributed electronically.

In that environment, access to the portal can feel necessary for staying current with the association, despite the existence of non-digital payment methods. Owners who want near real time information about their account, upcoming meetings or compliance issues often find that the most efficient route is to accept the portal’s registration screens and associated user agreement.

Arbitration, Liability Caps, and Data Rights


The user agreements behind many HOA-focused portals do more than authorize access to an online dashboard. They often set binding rules for dispute resolution, narrow remedies through liability caps, and define what the vendor may do with resident-provided information.

A recurring pattern is mandatory arbitration paired with class or representative waivers. This structure can push disputes into private, one-by-one proceedings rather than court, even where the underlying issue affects many owners. The same agreements often cap damages, which can reduce leverage over repeated small harms.

Some terms tie recovery to the disputed transaction amount, others set a fixed ceiling such as $5,000, and some cap aggregate liability at figures as low as $500.

Data provisions follow the same pattern. Some terms warn that enabling connected third-party products can permit broad access to user data while disclaiming responsibility for those third parties’ security and data handling. Other agreements grant expansive licenses over resident-provided information for operations, analytics, and improvements, paired with disclaimers that the service will be uninterrupted, error-free, or secure.

In the HOA context, these clauses can have a wider reach than in ordinary consumer “choice” settings because a single portal may serve an entire community selected through association governance. When a board adopts a given platform, standardized dispute, damages, and data terms can become the practical price of real-time account visibility.

ClickPay’s Individual-Only Rules


Under the terms of ClickPay, operated by NovelPay, LLC and part of the RealPage family of companies, a homeowner who disputes a payment error cannot recover more than the amount of the transaction at issue. The homeowner must pursue that claim through individual arbitration rather than court.

The terms include a dispute resolution framework that channels covered claims into binding arbitration with limits on class or representative proceedings and a jury-trial waiver.

The same agreement limits recoverable damages by capping liability to direct damages up to the amount of the payment transaction that is the subject of the claim. It also disclaims categories of indirect or consequential loss, while presenting the service on an “as is” and “as available” basis.

For a homeowner challenging a payment error, that structure can make the maximum recovery track the single payment at issue rather than broader alleged losses tied to downstream fees or consequences.

In an HOA that uses ClickPay as a preferred or default payment channel, individual owners generally do not have a practical path to negotiate alternative terms with the portal provider. They can choose not to register and instead use whatever non-portal methods the association offers, but if they want the portal’s account visibility and payment workflow, acceptance is bundled with the terms.

The agreement includes a 30-day window for new users to opt out of the arbitration provision by written notice to RealPage's Chief Legal Officer within 30 days of first accepting the terms. Opting out of the arbitration clause does not affect the transaction-level damages cap or the other provisions of the agreement.

AppFolio’s Caps, Arbitration, and Third-Party Data Exposure


AppFolio operates online portals for both rental and association communities, and its homeowner and tenant portal terms emphasize that the portal exists because a property manager or community association has subscribed.

On disputes and damages, AppFolio’s terms place covered claims into binding arbitration. They require claims to proceed on an individual basis rather than as a class or representative action, and cap total liability at the lesser of fees received in connection with payments or $5,000.

On data handling, the third-party products section is explicit about risk transfer. When a user enables third-party products connected to the portal, the user may be consenting to those third parties accessing or using data (including transmitting, transferring, deleting, modifying, or storing it). AppFolio disclaims liability for the third parties’ security and data handling.

AppFolio's terms include a comparable 30-day opt-out window for the arbitration agreement, available to new users by written notice to AppFolio's Chief Legal Officer at its Goleta, California address. TownSq's homeowner-facing terms contain no equivalent opt-out provision.

TownSq, Embedded Terms, and Broad Licenses


TownSq (operated by SocialCondo USA Holdings, LLC) positions itself as a community management platform that serves boards, managers and residents with tools for payments, communication and document sharing.

In TownSq's embedded Terms of Use, disputes are routed into individual binding arbitration administered by JAMS (Judicial Arbitration Mediation Services, Inc.) rather than court. This is accompanied by express waivers of jury trial and class actions, with Texas law governing and any in-person hearings held in Dallas.

TownSq's limitation language caps maximum aggregate liability at $500. The terms specifically name "unauthorized disclosure of your data" among the consequential harms for which TownSq accepts no liability, alongside losses from service interruptions and processing errors.

On data rights, TownSq’s terms also include a data-license provision that grants TownSq broad, perpetual rights to use, modify, and distribute resident-provided information for platform operations, analytics, improvements, and other stated business purposes. It assigns certain derivatives arising from that use to TownSq.

That derivative ownership provision extends beyond what most consumer software agreements claim. The terms state that any alterations, enhancements, or products derived from resident-provided information become TownSq's sole and exclusive property, together with all associated intellectual property rights.

A homeowner who uploads documents, payment records, or communications through the platform retains no rights in anything TownSq derives from that material. No equivalent claim appears in the ClickPay or AppFolio homeowner-facing terms reviewed for this article.

In a setting where an HOA or manager has effectively made TownSq the standard channel for payments and account visibility, the practical dynamic is consistent: the platform is selected upstream, while dispute rules, remedy limits, and data-use permissions are standardized downstream.

Limits of Consent and What Comes Next


The fine-print problem is not only arbitration. The combination of individual-only dispute channels, damage caps that make repeated small harms economically difficult to pursue, and data-use licenses that assign derivative rights to the vendor together narrow the practical options available when something goes wrong.

The combination of recorded covenants, board-selected management firms and standardized portal terms produces that outcome structurally. Covenants tied to the deed make dues payment non-optional, while portal adoption makes real-time account visibility and document access practically contingent on accepting platform terms.

In practice, owners who decline to use a portal may still pay by check or via alternative channels if the association offers them. Yet those owners may have slower or less complete access to account history, posted notices, or community documents if the association relies mainly on the portal for distribution.

That combination matters most in the situations homeowners actually fear: errors that cascade into late fees or enforcement actions, outages that delay time-sensitive responses, or data incidents that create downstream identity or financial risk. If remedies are capped and claims must proceed individually, the practical leverage shifts away from group action and toward regulators, board-level vendor negotiation, or isolated one-off disputes.

Boards and management firms retain an important role because they decide which portals to adopt and what fee structures, data terms, and service standards to accept in their master contracts. Management companies are private businesses that contract with boards, not with homeowners, and their commercial relationships with portal vendors are not subject to homeowner review or approval.

If associations demand clearer homeowner-facing terms, narrower data-use licenses, stronger security commitments, or more usable non-portal notice channels, they can influence the balance between portal efficiency and owner recourse more directly than individual users typically can.

In practical terms, that leverage runs through the association's governance process. Homeowners can request copies of the management contract at a board meeting, ask which portal terms were reviewed before the platform was adopted, or propose a vendor review as an agenda item at the next annual meeting. Individual owners who register with ClickPay or AppFolio should note the 30-day window to opt out of the arbitration provisions in writing.

For now, homeowners in many HOA communities are bound by covenants they did not draft, using portals they did not select, under terms they cannot negotiate. The board that chose the platform and the vendor that wrote the terms are the two parties with standing to change them.

Sources


Article Credits

Portrait of Michael LeSane
Michael LeSane
Editor